Conversation
Release/2.4.4
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 ( | ||
| `Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__, | ||
| `Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__ | ||
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it should refer to an unreleased objecttypes but if objecttypes is released first, then I say it should.
Also, should it referrer to Objecttypes 3.0.0 since that will remove also removed API V1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure if the specification version matches the application version necessarily (see my comment at maykinmedia/objecttypes-api#149 (comment))
There was a problem hiding this comment.
As this version number refers to the specification version, we could refer here to the latest specification version (2.0.0 in this case?) and use the link of the latest application openapi specification (that of 3.0.0) so that we don't link people to older openapi specifications 🤔
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 ( | ||
| `Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__, | ||
| `Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__ | ||
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't think it should refer to an unreleased objecttypes but if objecttypes is released first, then I say it should.
Also, should it referrer to Objecttypes 3.0.0 since that will remove also removed API V1
|
With this, are we removing support for Objecttypes-api < 3.0.0? |
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.0.0 ( | ||
| `Redoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__, | ||
| `Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/2.0.0/src/objecttypes/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`__ | ||
| `Objecttypes API`_ 2.2.2 ( |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm not sure if the specification version matches the application version necessarily (see my comment at maykinmedia/objecttypes-api#149 (comment))
stevenbal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just the question remaining about the listed API spec versions in the readme, but since that seems to be incorrect on main already, I won't let it block this release
README.NL.rst
Outdated
| latest n/a `ReDoc <https://redocly.github.io/redoc/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/master/src/objects/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`_, | ||
| `Swagger <https://petstore.swagger.io/?url=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/master/src/objects/api/v2/openapi.yaml>`_, | ||
| (`verschillen <https://github.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/compare/2.4.3..master#diff-b9c28fec6c3f3fa5cff870d24601d6ab7027520f3b084cc767aefd258cb8c40a>`_) | ||
| (`verschillen <https://github.com/maykinmedia/objects-api/compare/3.0.0..master>`_) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Same comment as here: https://github.com/maykinmedia/objecttypes-api/pull/149/files#r1917934515
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This changed in the README's in the same way the Objecttypes-API did it (renamed "Version" -> "Application version")
|
This is not breaking for OF, ZAC, KISS, OIP, ABC. I checked this with the PO's. |
Nope, the major version bump was needed to remove the v1 API. |
Partially fixes #513
Changes
Adds changes required for releasing
3.0.0. This is the major release part.